Saturday, November 26, 2022

Focus on Russia-Ukraine at G20, Has Geopolitics over casted economic cooperation at G20 Indonesia Summit 2022

The geopolitical crisis surrounding the Russia-Ukraine war and the growing tensions between China and the West came to the forefront as leaders of the world’s biggest economies gathered at the sun-shine island of Bali between 15-16 November. With the theme of “recover together, recover stronger”, the G20 Bali 2022 summit was the first multilateral forum where leaders have met since the Russia-Ukraine war. Despite of conspicuous absence of Vladimir Putin, the Russia-Ukraine war overshadowed events but failed to come up with any strong consensus. Even without Putin's attendance, G20 Bali Summit was about awkward moments and potential tension. Putin's absence also increased focus on President Xi, whose strong support for the Kremlin reflected well in the draft of the summit communique. The summit has also come when President Xi has further tightened his grip on power at the Communist Party congress. However, bilateral meetings on the side of the G20 between President Xi and President Biden did put a floor under their country’s relationship.

G20 is the collection of the 20 largest economies conceived mainly as a bloc to discuss economic and policy matters and coordinate some mutual interest financial issues. Emerged in the wake of the financial crisis, The bloc now accounts for 80 per cent of global economic output aimed at united finance ministers and central bankers from the largest economies. Though it initially focused on broad microeconomic policy, the last few summits, especially the G20 Bali 2022 summit, saw an expansion of its avenues to incorporate the significant challenges in the world today like Global Health and architecture, digital transformation and sustainable energy transition. Though the group’s main priorities are economics and development, unfortunately, there are limited substantial outcomes at the economic level to counter the sky-high inflation rate, energy security concerns, and food crisis so severe that some countries are on the verge of bankruptcy.

At the political level, it is evident that without the presence of Putin and Zelensky, no real peace or negotiation is possible. In fact Missile attack on Ukraine while the G20 leaders were debating the Russia-Ukraine war shows Putin's defiance of international laws. The 10-point peace plan and decry for ending the war by the Ukrainian President, who addressed the summit as G-19, looked futile as leaders failed to reach a common ground on ending the war. When the first summit was held in 2009, it was applauded for its diversity, strength and ability to respond to global challenges. However, the Bali G20 summit has been good at issuing a grandiose communique. It acknowledges that it is not an era of war but has proven incapable of advancing any solution. This G20 summit has also failed to raise consensus and deliver a joint text on energy and climate concerns. The lack of discussion around climate finance and the environmental impact of the Russia-Ukraine war also highlighted the limitation of the G20 summit. Undoubtedly nine months of war severely disrupted the trade, natural gas and food supplies but the discussion to mitigate geopolitical crisis also shifted the focus from economic progress. Sixty per cent of the countries are also facing sovereign debt distress. Without handling debt distress, it is impossible to initiate a vast flow of private sector climate finance and reach net zero.

India is next in line and inheriting a divided G-20. Indonesian Presidency kept G20 on life support and handed over the presidency to India, which now has the pivotal role of restructuring it as a functioning body before it loses its purpose. Indonesia's presidency has tried to create a powerful, balanced approach, and India is aiming for a more “inclusive, ambitious, decisive, and action-oriented” stand knowing the criticality of collaboration and cooperation at this juncture. Indonesia’s presidency sets the precedence for Global south setting the G20 agenda. From 1st December, India will take up the presidency, followed by Brazil and South Africa. This gives onus in the hand of the Afro-Asian nation to build a solid synergy to put forward cohesive plans and prioritize concerns of the developing world by building solidarity in the Global South. It also provides a unique opportunity for these four developing countries to create a strong niche by building a multilateral organization that sees beyond division and alignments. The task of driving a multilateral organization is a challenging task; it requires institutional effectiveness and a political stronghold. Nevertheless, India can utilize this opportunity to emerge as a strong player by championing the principle of non-alignment.

by Dr. Shreshtha Chkroborty, Asst. Prof., Department of Social and Political Studies, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Science (FBSS), Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies ( MRIIRS ), Faridabad, Haryana, shreshtha.fbss@mriu.edu.in










Tuesday, November 1, 2022

The Ancient Economic History

Ancient Indian Economic History refers to the economic activities that happened in the Indian ancient time when the world was not much aware of the economy and the word used in the history was “Arthashastra”. Ancient Indian History itself is the root of many great things globally. The time period of Ancient India starts from 3000BC to 500CE which was the end of the Gupta dynasty too. As we all know, the father of economics, Adam Smith, was an 18th-century Scottish economist but no one teaches us about Kautilya also known as Chanakya or Vishnugupta (350- 275 BCE). Chanakya was the father of Arthashashtra (which means Economics). He wrote the book Kautilya Arthashastra. He was the Prime Minister under the reign of Chandragupta Maurya. Chandragupta Maurya was the ruler of the Iron Age Indian Empire who expanded a geographically-extensive kingdom based in Magadha and founded the Maurya dynasty. He reigned from 324 BCE to 293 BCE. Chanakya was the one who made Chandragupta Maurya the king and established the Maurya dynasty. He had made possible a journey of a poor guy from shepherd to the king of the Maurya dynasty. He was a magician of economics and politics. Many great works had been done by him which include books on the nature of government, law, civil and criminal court systems, ethics, economics, markets and trade, the methods for screening ministers, diplomacy, theories on war, the nature of peace, and the duties and obligations of a king.

The Arthashastra is also known as Kautilya Arthashashtra. Kautilya wrote this book for his King Chandragupta Maurya and stated in its preface that it has been written as a guide for “those who govern”. Kautilya wanted the establishment and operation of the machinery through which the king preserves his integrity and solidarity of the state and generates power. It explores the issues of social welfare, the collective ethics that hold a society together, advising the king that in times and in areas devastated by famine, epidemic and such acts of nature, or by war, he should initiate public projects such as creating irrigation waterways and building forts around major strategic holdings and towns and exempt taxes on those affected.

It is astonishing to observe that several concepts of present-day management theories have been properly explained by Kautilya in his book. As in present-day management, the importance of vision, mission and motivation was captured in Arthashastra. Kautilya evolved an elaborate hierarchy under the king. The King appoints Amatya (The Prime Minister). Amatya operates day to day machinery of the state through a council of officials consisting of Mantris (The Ministers), Senapati (Defence Minister), purohit (The Chief Justice), and Yuvaraj, (The Hier Apparent) as the time changed and the Yuvaraj are not there in the present democratic Indian Economy. Kautilya weaves a design of a tall hierarchy for governance going down to the level of the village through his concept of Mandalas. Gram Panchayat and Panchayati Raj set up that were adopted by the Government of India can be considered as a logical derivative of Kautilya’s attempt to bring the administration to the lowest appropriate level in the machinery of state.

The Arthshastra was written in Sanskrit and was further translated into many other languages. Arthashashtra was rediscovered in 1905 by Rudrapatna Shamasastry and got published in 1909 and in 1915 in the English language. The translation project was termed to be one of the most difficult by R. Shamasastry. Arthashashtra is divided into 15 book titles, 150 chapters and 180 topics as follows:

Title

English

Title

English

Raja

King

Yuvaraja

Prince

Senapati

Chief, armed forces

Parishad

Council

Nagarika

Town Manager

Pauravya vaharika

City overseer

Mantri

Minister

Karmika

Work officer

Samnidhatr

Treasurer

Karmantika

Director of factories

Antapala

Frontier commander

Antar Vimsaka

Head

Dauvarika

Chief guard

Gopa

Revenue officer

Purohita

Chaplain

Karanika

Accounting officer

Prasastr

Administrator

Nayaka

Commander

Upayukta

Junior officer

Pradeshtri

Magistrates

Sunyapala

Regent

Adhyaksha

Superintendent



We had much other evidence to know about our ancient economic achievements but that vanished timely by many intruders. One of the pieces of evidence to know about our ancient economy is the Indus Valley Civilization. The Indus Valley Civilization is also the evidence for the Ancient Indian Economy. The Indus Valley civilisation, the first known permanent and predominantly urban settlement, flourished between 3500 BCE and 1800 BCE. It featured an advanced and thriving economic system. Its citizens practised agriculture, domesticated animals, made sharp tools and weapons from copper, bronze and tin, and traded with other cities. Evidence of well-laid streets, drainage systems and water supply in the valley's major cities, Dholavira, Harappa, Lothal, Mohenjo-Daro and Rakhigarhi, reveals their knowledge of urban planning. The Indus Valley civilisation is one of the four oldest civilizations and economical life was there. All the conditions were fulfilled in the Indus Valley Civilization to be called an Ancient Economic Civilization.

But the Mughals and East Indian Company destroyed many other proofs and evidence about the great achievements of Ancient Indian culture and some of that also got vanished by the modern education system. We are developing day by day and pushing ourselves towards being modern but it doesn’t mean that we have to lose our legacies made by our Rishi Munis and our ancestors. India was also known as “Sone ki chidiya” not just because of its wealth but also due to our rishi munis and the storage of knowledge.

It is all our compulsion to study the bookish language and what all the world is studying right now but it is our duty to initiate our ancestor’s and our rishi muni's legacy and pass them to the next generations. There is a quote “To forget one’s ancestors is to be a brook without a source and a tree without a root”. Without our ancestor’s legacy, we are just a kite, that means we are just dependent upon a string which could be cut out by anyone. To grow more we have to be a tree with vast roots inside the earth, and the roots are the knowledge passed from our ancestors, which we should spread not only in India but also all over the world.

Mr Yashraj Tanwar, MA Economics, (Batch AY2022-23), Department of Economics, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences (FBSS), Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies (MRIIRS), Faridabad, Haryana. yashrajtanwar2002@gmail.com